From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-20 05:59:02
From: "David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]>
> Would it also make sense to add a shared_ptr(counted_base*)
> c'tor for geniuses who try to create a shared_ptr from a refcounted
> object directly, instead of from intrusive_ptr?
This was my original idea, but I consider the intrusive_ptr approach
slightly better. The problem with the constructor is that the 'obvious'
signatures collide with the existing constructors.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk