From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-24 10:23:05
From: "Darin Adler" <darin_at_[hidden]>
> One possibility is to overload for the counted_base case and make it an
> error to construct a shared_ptr from one of these objects. You could
> explicitly construct an intrusive_ptr if you were doing it intentionally.
You know how users react to this, don't you. ;-) If it's smart enough to
give an error, why isn't it smart enough to do the right thing? What is
gained by the error?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk