[boost] Re: Re: Intrusive smart pointer

From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-25 16:18:40

"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:aa9dkj$lev$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> What do you think of Dietmar's suggestion that there should be a single
> common smart_ptr<T> interface (with different common policy variations,
> I suppose?), for interoperability reasons, and a separate policy-based
> smart pointer that is possibility the implementation(s) of the simple
> interface?

I believe it is a wrong suggestion, and I'll give details in my next post.

Andrei