[boost] Re: smart pointer compatibility

From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-01 15:27:50

"Greg Colvin" <greg_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:5.1.0.14.0.20020501110228.02ad1590_at_GMMAIL...
> At 12:21 AM 05/01/2002, Andrei wrote:
>
> >> What does that cost the user?
> >
> >> Binary compatibility.
> >
> >Only both a) policy based smart pointers together with
> >b) one standard way to define and use a default smart pointer
> >for a specific type will be an acceptable solution.

I didn't write that.

Andrei