|
|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-02 10:26:11
----- Original Message -----
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo_at_[hidden]>
> Just a note. Do you guys think it is worth adding a BOOST_NO_EBO, and
use
> this technique just as a fallback? I don't usually like seeing so much
> (meta-)code added to a library just to work around limitations of some
> compilers, unless it is well separated.
To make this useful we'd need NO_EBO and NO_MULTIPLE_INHERITANCE_EBO at
least.
-Dave
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk