Re: [boost] Utility for get/set member functions

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-11 16:10:49

At Saturday 2002/05/11 13:32, you wrote:
>Hello,

[deleted]

>And x doesn't even have to exist. It can be something abstract...
>The user's code is then full of something like
>     foo.set_x(foo.get_x() + 10);

I think if you want "abstract" the user's code should be full of something 
like:
     foo.x += 10;

the intent of the code, IMO, is a lot clearer

[deleted]

>Dragan Milenkovic
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"