Re: [boost] Overloading a function taking a boost::function

From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-12 14:43:15

> This has nothing to do with my original problem, but I'm curious what this
> Boost.Function constructor would look like if there was a working
> boost::arity_traits class. I'm relatively new to generic programming using
> C++ templates and I'd like to learn more.

What exactly do we need from an arity_traits/function_traits class?  To be more
clear, what should be in it, and is it a necessity that it compile on
non-compliant compilers (i.e. partial specialization)?

Paul Mensonides