Re: [boost] Overloading a function taking a boost::function

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-12 18:33:41

On Sunday 12 May 2002 06:40 pm, you wrote:
> Cool. This arg_tuple_size seems to me as having enough functionality to
> create
> the discussed Boost.Function constructor. (With some additional
> specializations/
> overloads for things like boost::function, std::unary_function and
> std::binary_function.)
>
> So, is this anything to be expected in the next version of Boost.Function?

Definately not for 1.28.0, but if we can find a way to do it for arbitrary 
function objects then it may make a later version.

        Doug