From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-17 07:59:08
On Friday 17 May 2002 06:59 am, Thomas Witt wrote:
> one thing i found missing from the signals documentation is that an empty
> signal can not be called with the default combiner (Yes I discovered this
> the hard way :-(). I think it would really help if this were documented in
> the signal invocation section of signalN.
Would it suffice to document that the default combiner is "last_value<R>"
(instead of the terribly underspecified "implementation defined") and make a
notation in the tutorial? Making the notation directly in operator() just
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk