Re: [boost] boost-1.28.0 failure with gcc-3.1

From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-17 08:09:02

On Friday, May 17, 2002, at 02:53 PM, David Abrahams wrote:

> Are there  one or more GCC-3.1 bugs uncovered here?
> Has anyone submitted a report to gnats?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Neal D. Becker" <nbecker_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 7:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [boost] boost-1.28.0 failure with gcc-3.1
>
>
>> Thanks!  That also fixed it here.  Strange that my completely bogus
>> patch also silenced gcc's complaints.

I don't think so. According to the standard (Sec. 24) ostream_iterator 
is defined
in the <iterator> header. This is probably implicitly included by some 
other
header on other platforms, but not on gcc-3.1 . It was thus a bug in 
boost::random.

Matthias