Re: [boost] Trolls and Signals

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-22 03:40:15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Lars,

On Wednesday 22 May 2002 01:20, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> They (TT/QT) had the excant same problem with a define "emit" that
> they introduced as a keyword.

If it comes to the technique signals is only an example. "slots" has exactly 
the same problem.

>
> | Yes I am going to ask TT to fix this. No I don't think they are going to
> | do it and anyway it will take time.
> |
> | Any idea how to work around this problem?
>
> #undef signals

I think in general this does not work, because you may need to restore the 
define for subsequent include qt headers. It finally breaks if you have a 
class that has both qt and boost signals.

Thomas

- -- 
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: [phone] - 4273, fax: [phone]
http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD4DBQE861lz0ds/gS3XsBoRAmLiAJ9sIahlLqCIhVKeAu4ACzqwkztyiACXVmRm
R67/ZEV4+29MQXuVTbv66A==
=BP3d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----