Re: [boost] signals lib: ordering_test.cpp

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-24 07:12:23

John,
  Yes, we should use std::rand. It's fixed now.

        Thanks,
        Doug

On Friday 24 May 2002 06:46 am, John Maddock wrote:
> I notice that the test program libs/signals/ordering_test.cpp is using
> random(void), but that's a unix specific API: shouldn't we be using
> std::rand here instead?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John Maddock
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm