Boost logo

Boost :

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-24 07:12:23

  Yes, we should use std::rand. It's fixed now.


On Friday 24 May 2002 06:46 am, John Maddock wrote:
> I notice that the test program libs/signals/ordering_test.cpp is using
> random(void), but that's a unix specific API: shouldn't we be using
> std::rand here instead?
> Thanks,
> John Maddock

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at