From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-24 07:12:23
Yes, we should use std::rand. It's fixed now.
On Friday 24 May 2002 06:46 am, John Maddock wrote:
> I notice that the test program libs/signals/ordering_test.cpp is using
> random(void), but that's a unix specific API: shouldn't we be using
> std::rand here instead?
> John Maddock
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk