From: William E. Kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-31 17:11:54
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Elliott" <pelliott_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost Mailing list" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:00 PM
Subject: [boost] thread programing by deriving?
>Thread programming by deriving. Does anyone have any classes
>that allow you to define your thread code by deriving from
>a base class?
>I am used to this style. It does not give the user the
>ability to make an error doing casting of void* in defining
>the thread run code.
Boost.Threads does not have a problem with casting void*. The thread
function is a function object that takes no parameters at all. Using
Boost.Bind or rolling your own function objects allows you to pass data with
no void* conversions. Example:
void foo(int a)
int main(int argc, char* argv)
boost::thread thread(boost::bind(&foo, 10));
This creates a thread using the foo function, passing it a value of 10. No
where in this code is there a void*.
If you still prefer using derivation this should be trivial to implement on
top of Boost.Threads.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk