From: Lars Gullik Bjønnes (larsbj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-11 12:04:44
"David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> writes:
| From: "Lars Gullik Bjønnes" <larsbj_at_[hidden]>
>> When testing this and the prev. version with gcc, I get a 2:3
>> perfomance difference in favour of the traditional solution.
>> Gcc 3.1 -O3
>> Number1: 6650000
>> Number2: 9900000
| That's not surprising. What happens when you try the version that actually
| returns the postfix_incrementer<number> instead of the number?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk