Re: [boost] Dynamic Bitset formal review

From: Chuck Allison (cda_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-15 11:58:15

Chuck will edit it post haste.

squeezing-it-into-my-already-overstuffed-schedule-ly-yours

Chuck the Editor

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Dynamic Bitset formal review

>
> From: "Jeremy Siek" <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
>
> > I've gone through and done a careful revision of the docs. The new
> version
> > is uploaded to Files.
>
> "Rationale: This function is not a member function taking zero arguments
> and returns a string for a couple reasons."
>
> I think it needs a once-over from a good editor. Say, isn't Chuck an
> editor?
>
> > over-worked-and-underpaidly-yours,
> > Jeremy
>
> i-feel-your-pain-ly y'rs,
> dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>