Boost logo

Boost :

From: Ed Brey (brey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-17 23:08:05

"Jeremy Siek" <jsiek_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> To make sure I understand the motivation for this... you're saying that
> the above is better then the following
> while (bits[5])
> Do_something(bits);
> because... it could be more efficient? It is more convenient? Do you have
> another reason?

Effency and convenience are motivations, but primarily it's expressive power. You can't pass around a "bits[5]" like you can a const_reference.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at