[boost] Re: Future of share_ptr

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-19 03:49:48

Dave Harris wrote:
> 
> The older, non-intrusive version of shared_ptr has major problems. The
> newer, optionally intrusive version is too new to know whether it has
> problems. I'd say it was a strong candidate but not "almost certain" to be
> added.
> 
> -- Dave Harris
> 

BTW, is there any documentation on using the intrusive features of
the new shared_ptr? Or isn't it supposed to be used outside the
implementation?

Markus