Boost logo

Boost :

From: Bjorn.Karlsson_at_[hidden]
Date: 2002-06-19 06:17:00

> From: Douglas Gregor [mailto:gregod_at_[hidden]]
> The STL containers also have this restriction, so I can only
> assume that the
> restriction was inherited.

True, but then again, the old rule "promise no less, require no more" could
be used without bending the STL container restrictions out-of-bounds too far
(pun intended). If array were to meet all of the requirements for
containers, I'd say that this change was bad, but as is, I think it's a good

[I've had an off-list conversation with Nicolai, and as I understand it
he'll be adding this to the wish/todo-list for array.]


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at