From: Hendrik Schober (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-24 07:12:27
"Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Mhmm. I don't see your point. This information _is_
> > available in the exception's ctor. You say things
> > would be a lot better if it was available in the
> > catch handler. Where's the difference?
> If you put a breakpoint in the catch block (because you know that's where
> your getting) it makes a HUGE difference.
> The problem basically trying to determine where the _throw_ occurred.
So simply set a breakpoint in the exception's ctor.
I see that this doesn't work for exception types
you have no source code for. But then what would a
stack trace look like for these?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk