From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-24 11:56:44
From: "Phil Nash" <phil.nash.lists_at_[hidden]>
> Are the instrusive pointer semantics in shared_ptr being used by people in
> real projects yet, or is it too experimental.
Yes. I use it. What library designer would refuse to use its creation? ;-)
> Also, I presume that weap_ptr's are still interoperable with intrusively
> counted shared_ptrs - is that a valid assumption?
> I would like to use it in our project, but don't want to if it is likely
> be removed, or significantly changed in the near future - or is too
> incomplete to use. I don't mind a few issues in it that I can report back
> to feed into development.
It's fairly complete, but I can offer no guarantees about stability. (As
with anything undocumented.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk