From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-25 14:16:48
Is anyone from MicroSoft listening that can shed any light on this?
I have searched the Knowledge Base without any more clues.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Martin Schuerch
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:33 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Re: Problems with uBLAS and /Zm Option (VC7)
> "Paul A. Bristow" <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > I have now run all the uBLAS tests 1 to 6 in release as well as debug
> > I slightly suspect that using pre-compiled headers causes the compiler
> > overflow C1060 with test6. There is certainly something very
> funny about
> > the setting. I now think that rebuild/clean causes a compiler reset so
> > heap is cleared.
> > Smells like a memory leak in the compiler? Surely not!
> > /Zm1000 IS sufficient for my tests. I only have 256Mbyte memory (Windows
> > 2000).
> The funny thing is, that /Zm1000 doesn't work for me (1GB memory)
> but /Zm500
> > Paul
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk