Boost logo

Boost :

From: boost (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-25 18:11:06


On Tuesday 25 June 2002 15:10, Simon J. Julier wrote:
> Does anybody know a "good" set of command line options which should be used
> to compile uBLAS? I compiled the benchmarks using cygwin gcc 3.1, running
> under Win2k with the "-O2" option. I see a significant difference in
> performance. The last test from bench1, multiplying 100x100 matrices
> together, gives the following results:

I'm using

OPTFLAGS = -DNDEBUG -march=i686 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-frerun-cse-after-loop -felide-constructors -fexpensive-optimizations
-fdelayed-branch -fschedule-insns2

allthough I have not made a deep study, just added options as long as the
performance of my programme increased (not jus ublas ).

Best wishes,

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at