Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-26 09:32:39

From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
>
> From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
>
> > I guess the right thing to do is to document 'get_pointer(px)' as
returng
> > the raw pointer contained in px on the smart pointer side, and make
> > mem_fn_get_pointer forward to it on the mem_fn side. Comments?
>
> Do we need two separate functions?

It would be preferable to have the finer control... if it were possible. I
forgot that you cannot forward in C++.