Re: [boost] Re: On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-26 11:17:03

From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> Oh, I found that confusing because the pointer might well be something
that
> can't be expressed in "C".
> What's wrong with "raw_" (or if you like, from your explanation, "bare_")?
> Doesn't that pretty much say it all?

What is wrong with 'get_pointer'?