From: Benedikt Weber (weber_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-30 07:19:17
> It's a proven (but not well known ;-) technique to reintroduce
> temporaries at the right places into the expression, i.e. writing A *
> (B * v).
I am glad there is at least a possibility to force the creation of a
temporary. However, the user should not have to be concerned about such
details. I never did anything with expression templates and I only recently
read about them in the context of the Spirit parser. However, I think it
should be possible to change the design so a temporary is automatically
introduced where appropriate (say for the prod() functions). I urge you to
think about a possibility to change that. It would be a real benefit for the
> Yes, I'm currently thinking about changing the interface for prod() to
> the above problem more clear.
While personally I would prefer operator* also for matrix/matrix and
matrix/vector product, your prod() has the "advantage" that is more
complicated to write prod(A,prod(B,v)) than A*(B*v) and so users won't write
complicated expressions and not encounter the problem so often. However,
that seems not to be the real solution to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk