Re: [boost] Re: uBLAS formal review

From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-02 01:17:56

On Monday 01 July 2002 22:46, Benedikt Weber wrote:
> This is my formal review on uBLAS.
> * The BLAS description is nice but distracting in an introduction. uBLAS is
> much more general and the examples should emphasise that fact, rather than
> being restricted to BLAS.

Well, I just introduced one of our LA guys to uBLAS and he likes this page 
most of all.

> * A better output operator with matrices printing in rows and columns. A
> matrix with complex numbers is hardly readable in the present version:
> [3,3](((0,0),(1,0),(2,0)),((1,0),(2,0),(3,0)),((2,0),(3,0),(4,0)))

I agree. In my copy, I always change it to print them in matlab style and one 
row per line. (e.g. 
[ 1 2 3  ;
  4 5 6 ;
  7 8 9 ]
).