RE: [boost] uBLAS formal review

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-08 18:06:13

I was under the impression that CVS handled all this transparently.  We 
certainly had no problems at the last place I worked that used CVS, then 
again, we had no macs around either.  But it certainly seemed to handle LF 
and CRLF just fine.

At Monday 2002/07/08 14:08, you wrote:
>At 02:14 AM 7/8/2002, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>
> >Thanks for this suggestion - but most important I was saying that a Boost
> >release should not contain 'features' like this, especially when they cause
> >such perplexing effects.
>
>We currently scan periodically for certain problems; tabs in source files, 
>file names too long, etc.
>
>I would hate to discriminate against the Mac folks by banning CR 
>terminations altogether, but am at a loss as to what to do.
>
>Maybe ban files that mix CR-only line terminations with the other two.
>
>Anyone have any better ideas?
>
>--Beman
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"