|
Boost : |
From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-09 15:45:25
> "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:097901c2277f$8cb6df40$6601a8c0_at_boostconsulting.com...
> > [...]
> > Wouldn't a syntax like:
> >
> > invoke(target, pmf, arg1, arg2...)
> > [...]
>
> Yeah, I like that syntax, and I see that it spares you the intermediate
> closure object. I could write invoke() myself for a few cases, but I
> don't understand the preprocessor lib enough to make it generic
> for arbitrary numbers of parameters. Of course, people will still
> argue that you should just use bind(), and maybe they're right. ;)
>
> Dave
Give me an example of what you want (the first few maybe)--when you guys decide
what you want, and I would be more than happy to generate it.
Paul Mensonides
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk