From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-16 01:11:11
> because they tend to be close to reserved names. I'm no expert on smart
> pointers, but it seems that std::auto_ptr could easily have taken this
> route. My question is: why did it not?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk