Re: [boost] boost::function< R (*) (A1, A2) >

From: Giovanni Bajo (giovannibajo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-19 09:09:15

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost List" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 2:19 PM
Subject: [boost] boost::function< R (*) (A1, A2) >

> Do you think that it might be a good idea to allow boost::function's
> declared as:
>
> function< void (*) (char const * name, int mode) > pf;
>
> ?

Is there any specific reason to support such a syntax? function<void, char
const*, int> seems good enough to me.

Giovanni Bajo