From: Alan Bellingham (alan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-19 11:09:33
"Anthony Williams" <anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden]>:
>These are all valid workarounds. I think I prefer option 1, but I wouldn't
>like to maintain the de-macro-fying header, given that MS changes/extends
>the API every few months...
Well, there's always diff ...
>Also, as Gennaro pointed out in another post, the MFC and ATL classes have
>members that _pretend_ to be called MessageBox, GetWindowText... If you make
>these real names, and not macros, then you will probably meet
In the name of all that's holy, that's _vile_. Actually, I suspect that
ATL may be OK (it does tend to be template based code, not relying on
pre-built code so much), but I think you're right about MFC.
What a horrible concept.
Still, given that all headers that rely on this behaviour should be
included before the undefining header, it looks doable.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk