Re: [boost] Formal Review: Template Metaprogramming Library (MPL)

From: Ron Garcia (garcia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-20 14:24:20

David Abrahams wrote:

>Ron Garcia wrote:
>  
>
>>I think "metafunctions" is adequate, but "metafunction classes" seems
>>fine as well.
>>    
>>
>
>Those are separate concepts. A simple C++ metafunction looks like this:
>  
>
Ahh.  I was thinking more that MPL supplies metafunctions (i.e. 
apply_if), but the sentence is referring to the framework, which seems 
to focus more on the metafunction classes than metafunctions.

ron