From: Ron Garcia (garcia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-20 14:24:20
David Abrahams wrote:
>Ron Garcia wrote:
>>I think "metafunctions" is adequate, but "metafunction classes" seems
>>fine as well.
>Those are separate concepts. A simple C++ metafunction looks like this:
Ahh. I was thinking more that MPL supplies metafunctions (i.e.
apply_if), but the sentence is referring to the framework, which seems
to focus more on the metafunction classes than metafunctions.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk