Re: [boost] Intel added to Win32 regression tests

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-25 09:34:21

At 09:32 AM 7/25/2002, David Abrahams wrote:

 >Why don't you just fix the #ifdef checks? Seems easier and more 
beneficial
 >to me...

You mean why don't we get the authors to fix the #ifdef checks:-?

 >In general it's due to checks in the test .cpp files which look for
 >BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIATION which should instead be looking
 >at something that tells them whether iterator traits work for pointers.

Does that mean a new macro, or is BOOST_NO_STD_ITERATOR_TRAITS good enough? 

It sounds like you are saying the condition is really a new one - 
BOOST_NO_STD_ITERATOR_TRAITS_FOR_POINTERS.

--Beman