From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-25 09:34:21
At 09:32 AM 7/25/2002, David Abrahams wrote:
>Why don't you just fix the #ifdef checks? Seems easier and more
You mean why don't we get the authors to fix the #ifdef checks:-?
>In general it's due to checks in the test .cpp files which look for
>BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIATION which should instead be looking
>at something that tells them whether iterator traits work for pointers.
Does that mean a new macro, or is BOOST_NO_STD_ITERATOR_TRAITS good enough?
It sounds like you are saying the condition is really a new one -
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk