From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-26 11:41:05
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thursday 25 July 2002 14:29, David Abrahams wrote:
> From: "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > Herve,
> > On Monday 22 July 2002 17:17, Herve Bronnimann wrote:
> > > Dear review wizard: I'd like to request a formal review of the minmax
> > > library that's been sitting in the sandbox for a little while now.
> > > Please contact me to arrange a schedule.
> > I am a bit concerned regarding this one. I am unsure whether the size and
> > scope of the library justifies the effort of a formal review. Though I
> > be wrong. IIRC somebody proposed to integrate this with a possible boost
> > algorithm library.
> > Comments anybody ?
> Just how small is it?
600+ lines header and on html file.
After thinking some more about this I came to the conclusion that we should
find a way to review algorithms one by one. Waiting for the one big algorithm
lib might not be such a good idea. Furthermore I think that the review effort
will not be that big.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: +49(0) 511 762 - 4273, fax: +49(0) 511 762-3001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk