Re: [boost] Review request: minmax library

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-26 11:41:05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 25 July 2002 14:29, David Abrahams wrote:
> From: "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]>
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > Herve,
> >
> > On Monday 22 July 2002 17:17, Herve Bronnimann wrote:
> > > Dear review wizard: I'd like to request a formal review of the minmax
> > > library that's been sitting in the sandbox for a little while now.
> > > Please contact me to arrange a schedule.
> >
> > I am a bit concerned regarding this one. I am unsure whether the size and
> > scope of the library justifies the effort of a formal review. Though I
>
> might
>
> > be wrong. IIRC somebody proposed to integrate this with a possible boost
> > algorithm library.
> >
> > Comments anybody ?
>
> Just how small is it?

600+ lines header and on html file.

After thinking some more about this I came to the conclusion that we should 
find a way to review algorithms one by one. Waiting for the one big algorithm 
lib might not be such a good idea. Furthermore I think that the review effort 
will not be that big.

- --Thomas

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

- -- 
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: [phone] - 4273, fax: [phone]
http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9QXul0ds/gS3XsBoRAtASAKCB3DVRzD8T3Udn9rt131CSw32U/wCeITmq
A8YUq+QdHUJnxmf37RmyT7o=
=Jh2R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----