[boost] Re: Yet Another Pointer Policy Proposal... Fast One

From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippeb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-27 09:56:04

"Gennadiy Rozental" <rogeeff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:ahtmq6$rt$1_at_main.gmane.org...
>

[...]

In fact the syntax could be discussed because there are different
possibilities:
1) shared_ptr< rc<parent> > p = new (new (xmm) child("John", "McInnis"))
rc<child>;

2) shared_ptr< rc<parent> > p = new (new (xmm()) child("John", "McInnis"))
rc<child>;

3) shared_ptr< rc<parent> > p = rc(new (xmm) child("John", "McInnis"));

4) shared_ptr< rc<parent> > p = rc(new (xmm()) child("John", "McInnis"));
5) shared_ptr< rc<parent> > p = make_rc(child("John", "McInnis"));
// With macro usages

I personaly prefer the first one but I'm not sure what you think.  Votings
(for including it then for syntax) would help me on this because the backend
depends on the syntax primarily.

Thank you,

Philippe A. Bouchard