From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippeb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-27 11:15:37
"Gennadiy Rozental" <rogeeff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> No. No. You still fail to get the point. I don't bother (yet) how fast is
> your pointer and how simple is an interface (once it is different from
> What I asked you to prove is: "to prove that conventional way does not
> here while yours does"
The conventional way will always work there's no doubt. I can't prove the
contrary except for negligeable small memory restrictions. It is a pure and
simple speed _extension_... I thought that Boost was all about this?!?
Philippe A. Bouchard
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk