From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-28 13:38:54
On Saturday 27 July 2002 03:10 pm, David Abrahams wrote:
> 1. Is there going to be a similar syntax change to that used for
> signal<void(int, int, char*)>
Yes, they will have the same syntax as boost::function: signal<function-type>
or signalN<return-type, arg1-type, arg2-type, ..., argN-type>.
> 2. The example at the bottom of libs/signals/doc/tutorial.html doesn't seem
> to illustrate anything having to do with nearby text, which seems
> incomplete. In fact, it appears
> to be a subset of an earlier example. Am I missing something?
You're not missing anything; libs/signals/doc/tutorial.html is missing quite a
bit, unfortunately. I'll try to finish up this documentation soon.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk