[boost] Re: Yet Another Pointer Policy Proposal... Fast One

From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-28 18:27:30

> We do you think about those different possibilities:
> 1) new type();
> 2) new (xmm) type();
> 3) make_rc(type());
> 4) make_rc(new (xmm) type());
> 5) new (new (xmm) type()) rc<type>;

Are you kidding me??!! Can't you explain without SINGLE C++ statement, what
is your idea and why it could not be implemented the conventional way and
without overridding any operators new?

> Too bad.  'Boost' sounded like a performance catalyst.

It does mean programmers performance boost.

Gennadiy.