|
Boost : |
From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-31 16:06:33
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Gennaro Prota wrote:
gennar> Analogously, I wouldn't do something similar for the bit count.
gennar>
gennar> - reasonable approach (in my head :-)): choosing (besides the current
gennar> one) an implementation that performs well on most boost's target
gennar> platforms *but* giving the user the chance to provide his own
gennar> bit-twiddled version.
Allowing user customization in this regard is not a good idea. It will
greatly increase the code complexity of the library, and only a miniscule
fraction of the users will need it. If someone needs the absolute best
performance on their platform, they can rewrite dynamic_bitset for their
own personal use.
-Jeremy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Siek http://php.indiana.edu/~jsiek/
Ph.D. Student, Indiana Univ. B'ton email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org) office phone: (812) 855-3608
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk