From: Glen Knowles (gknowles_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-02 08:24:08
>From "Peter Dimov":
> ++p2.begin() already doesn't work. An iterator is not required to be a
> type, and therefore, its rvalues aren't required to support ++. All
> rvalues, despite being non-qualifiable, are de-facto const.
The idea that an implementation may or may not be de-facto const sounds like
a good argument to make it explicitly const and remove all doubt.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk