From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-02 10:12:09
At 09:53 AM 8/2/2002, David Abrahams wrote:
>From: "Keith Burton" <kb_at_[hidden]>
>> Sorry but I cannot let this misinterpretation of what I said go :
>> All I said was to remove the pre-condition exception that the path must
>> exist , I said nothing about removing the post-condition exception that
>> the path must not exist. ( I mean exist not just be reachable ).
>FWIW, that's always made the most sense to me.
Again, the function remove_all() is provided to meet the need for a
function which does not throw an exception if the target doesn't exist.
It seems to me people are advocating something that is already provided. Am
I missing something?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk