Re: [boost] compilingboostwithoutexceptions(Boost.All,Boost.SmartPtr)

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-09 11:11:32

From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> 
> Anyway, boost_throw is not a customization point for generic code, it is a
> replaceable error handler. I'll be happy to comply to whatever the Boost
> policy is, whenever there is one, I mean.

That leads me to wonder whether we should take the set_terminate, et. al.,
approach:

   namespace boost {
      typedef void (*exception_handler_function)(???);

      exception_handler_function
      set_exception_handler(exception_handler_function);
   }

-- 
Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     http://www.sig.com
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;