|
Boost : |
From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-12 12:52:42
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 12 August 2002 17:33, Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 08:28 AM 8/12/2002, Thomas Witt wrote:
> >In "File and directory recommendations" the rationale given for "Do not
> >assume names are case sensitive." is wrong. I agree that there are case
> >insensitive filesystems (FAT32 IIRC) but not all Windows fs are case
> >insensitive. NTFS for instance is in fact case sensitive, Windows just
> >tries to hide this.
>
> For context, the quote is from a series of portability recommendations,
> including both:
>
> -- Do not assume names are case sensitive.
> -- Do not assume names are case insensitive.
>
> It seems to me those are both valid recommendations for programs which wish
> to be widely portable.
Violent agreement.
>
> So, it really is a question of making the rationale a bit more
> precise.
Thats why I labelled it nitpick.
> I'll do that, based on the comments of other responses.
Thanks
- --Thomas
- --
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: +49(0) 511 762 - 4273, fax: +49(0) 511 762-3001
http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9V/Xu0ds/gS3XsBoRAqyeAJ4jlnC1ErdSTT4mxH6+4Cm5miowUwCghShR
QHDAmxA9Or0OD9Q3zyQvpBU=
=F3Fi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk