From: William E. Kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-13 08:50:20
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> From: William E. Kempf
> From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> > Since you now seem willing to allow this non-default option to be made
> > available, what kind of interface do you suppose it should have? Should
> > be called asynchronous_call? advanced_thread?
> boost::thread. As for the interface, that's still something to work out.
> ===> Oh, what are some of the questions surrounding the interface?
Other than the ones that have been argued for the last few days?
> The existing boost::thread is going to undergo several changes in Rev. 2,
> some of which pretty much mandate a PIMPL idiom, so making the public
> interface a template will be trivial.
> ===> Glad to hear it! Any hopeful release date for revision 2? Can you
> outline some of the proposed changes?
No release date. Rev. 2 is a major revision and is taking some time to
complete. Some specific things planned in Rev. 2 for boost::thread include
adressing all of the issues Mr. Dimov pointed out, as well as adding "thread
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk