|
Boost : |
From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-13 12:05:46
The reason I asked was to know if you in fact saw that it was possible to
accout for the seeminly "infinite" number of exceptions a user may want to
specify...
----- Original Message -----
From: William E. Kempf
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Sent: Tuesday, 2002:August:13 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Attempting resolution of Threads & ExceptionsIssue
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> Sure, the details of how to handle unexpected exceptions are up for
debate.
> Originally, bad_exception seemed fitting to me, but giving std::exceptions
> special treatment by borrowing its .what () can be useful. Have you
reviewed
> my implementation?
Not to the depth required. I've only evaluated the interface, not the
implementation. Until we decide on the desired semantics I'd rather not
think about the implementation.
Bill Kempf
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk