|
Boost : |
From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-13 17:59:34
Any particular reason why the shared_ptr shouldn't provide the semantics of
its underlying type? It already attempts to with operator -> (), etc...
----- Original Message -----
From: David Abrahams
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Sent: Tuesday, 2002:August:13 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Threads & Exceptions
From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> Would it be possible to implement the shared_ptr so that it could inherit
> from a shared_ptr of a second parameter (yes, dual hierarchies, but no
> multiple-inheritance I guess), so that it didn't have a number of
reference
> counters dependent on the height of the hierarchy?
No
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk