From: William E. Kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-14 09:59:06
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> > Here are the problems I know of that need fixes or investigation:
> > * !!(predicate) fix as discussed
> No longer necessary. I switched to BOOST_TEST(p? true: false); adding !!
> BOOST_TEST would silently test operator!, not the "boolean context"
I'd say it would still be necessary since other people are sure to use the
same construct. However, you bring up a good point about it causing the
wrong thing to be tested, so !! is the wrong solution. Probably need to
apply the ternary operator instead.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk