From: Ronald Garcia (garcia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-14 14:03:11
Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
>>I found that the previous test tools compiled quickly when included into
>>an application in this manner. Do the basic features from the previous
>>Boost.Test (specifically Execution Tools) really require a large
>>quantity of code?
>To use only Programm Execution Monitor you need to include
>It will catch for you all the exception and provide unified return codes.
>But this does not include test tools, which are implemented through unit
>test framework core.
Thank you for the information. A helper header might be nice, though
you might just add a macro like BOOST_CPP_MAIN to execution_monitor.hpp,
which is reminiscent of the old system. Either solution would be fine
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk