Re: [boost] Boost.Build/Boost.Jam issues w/ gcc v302

From: Ronald Garcia (garcia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-14 15:45:09

David Abrahams wrote:

>I don't know what you mean; you've done the best analysis I've seen to
>date. Headers found through -isystem should be allowed to contain C++ code!
>
>  
>
At the time I was thinking that perhaps -isystem should not set 
different line number flags at all, but upon checking the docs again I 
see that it does call for special treatment of headers, at least with 
regard to warnings. My question now though is the following:  should the 
boost libraries be treated specially with respect to warnings? Does 
using -isystem inhibit detection of warnings that are otherwise valid?

I will try out the patch and submit a bug report.  Thanks for the quick 
help on this.

ron