|
Boost : |
From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-15 04:35:09
At Wednesday 2002/08/14 14:31, you wrote:
>
> > If the contents are going in "namespace time" and if boost:: turns into
> > std:: at some point, there will be a conflict with std::time. :-)
>
>Actually, I am worried about that as well. I personally prefer datetime,
>but several people point out that a 'date' is just a 'time' and hence
>time is the better option.
I agree that date is a range of time, but many people don't...they labor
under the delusion that date and time are separable.
for that reason, I vote for datetime
>Jeff
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk